Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:442Hits:20756018Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID081560
Title ProperPolitical institutions and human rights
Other Title Informationwhy dictatorships enter into the United Nations convention against Torture
LanguageENG
AuthorVreeland, James Raymond
Publication2008.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article addresses a puzzle: dictatorships that practice torture are more likely to accede to the UN Convention Against Torture (CAT) than dictatorships that do not practice torture. I argue the reason has to do with the logic of torture. Torture is more likely to occur where power is shared. In one-party or no-party dictatorships, few individuals defect against the regime. Consequently, less torture occurs. But dictatorships are protorture regimes; they have little interest in making gestures against torture, such as signing the CAT. There is more torture where power is shared, such as where dictatorships allow multiple political parties. Alternative political points of view are endorsed, but some individuals go too far. More acts of defection against the regime occur, and torture rates are higher. Because political parties exert some power, however, they pressure the regime to make concessions. One small concession is acceding to the CAT
`In' analytical NoteInternational Organization Vol. 62, No.1; Winter 2008: p64-101
Journal SourceInternational Organization Vol. 62, No.1; Winter 2008: p64-101
Key WordsUnited Nations ;  Convention Against Torure


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text