| ID | 081741 |
| Title Proper | International monetary system |
| Other Title Information | diffusion and ambiguity |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Cohen, Benjamin J |
| Publication | 2008. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article examines the dynamics of power and rule-setting in the international monetary system. It begins with a brief discussion of the meaning of power in international monetary relations, distinguishing between two critical dimensions of monetary power: autonomy and influence. Major developments have led to a greater diffusion of power in monetary affairs, both among states and between states and societal actors. But the diffusion of power has mainly been in the dimension of autonomy, rather than influence, meaning that leadership in the system has been dispersed rather than relocated-a pattern of change in the geopolitics of finance that might be called leaierless diffusion. The pattern of leaderless diffusion, in turn, is generating greater ambiguity in prevailing governance structures. Rule-setting in monetary relations increasingly relies not on negotiations among a few powerful states but, rather, on the evolution of custom and usage among growing numbers of autonomous agents. Impacts on governance structures can be seen on two levels: the individual state and the global system. At the state level, the dispersion of power compels governments to rethink their commitment to national monetary sovereignty. At the systemic level, it compounds the difficulties of bargaining on monetary issues. More and more, formal rules are being superseded by informal norms that emerge, like common law, not from legislation or statutes but from everyday conduct and social convention. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Affairs Vol. 84, No.3; May 2008: p455-470 |
| Journal Source | International Affairs Vol. 84, No.3; May 2008: p455-470 |
| Key Words | International Monetary System ; Governance ; National Sovereignty |