| ID | 083060 |
| Title Proper | Human security as power/knowledge |
| Other Title Information | the biopolitics of a definitional debate |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Grayson, Kyle |
| Publication | 2008. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article interrogates the parameters of the human security debate as a site of biopolitics in order to gain an understanding of how it has been possible to shape the debate in certain ways and not others. The role of cosmological realism in grounding knowledge claims within the debate is explored. By privileging objectivist claims to knowledge of human (in)security, it is argued that empiricism and rationalism, as forms of cosmological realism, foster the production of logics which facilitate forms of biopolitical intervention. The quest for precision, measurement, causality and policy relevance that define the production of human security knowledge is shown to have important political effects beyond the definitional debate itself in terms of agency, normalcy, and the scope for intervention. Therefore, this article demonstrates how the demarcation of human security as a field of knowledge is a process pregnant with relations of power that are important to understanding contemporary political dynamics |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 21, No.3; Sep 2008: p383-401 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 21, No.3; Sep 2008: p383-401 |
| Key Words | Human Security ; Realism ; Security |