Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1530Hits:19768528Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID084982
Title ProperBenchmarking Australian IR
Other Title Informationlow impact, a bookish lot or a very British affair?
LanguageENG
AuthorSharman, J C
Publication2008.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article assesses the global profile of Australian International Relations (IR) scholarship by measuring the presence of Australian-based scholars in leading journals and presses, relative to other non-US scholars. It presents three alternative conclusions, depending on the benchmark adopted. The first perspective, low impact, suggests that on the basis of publications in top journals, Australian IR scholars are doing a bad job, that is, Australian scholars have a much smaller presence in leading journals than could reasonably be expected. The second view, a bookish lot, is based on publication in leading book presses, and presents a much more positive picture. The third alternative, a very British affair, concludes that according to both journal and book data Australian scholars are notable for their disproportionate representation in British rather than American publication outlets. These claims are supported with publication data from top outlets over the past decade as determined by Australian and international rankings.
`In' analytical NoteAustralian Journal of International Affairs Vol. 62, No. 4; Dec 2008: p529-540
Journal SourceAustralian Journal of International Affairs Vol. 62, No. 4; Dec 2008: p529-540
Key WordsBritish Affsir ;  Austrakian - Information Retrival ;  Australian - IR