Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:362Hits:20351253Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID085403
Title ProperRise and fall of bureaucratic rationalization
Other Title Informationexploring the possibilities and limitations of the UN secretariat in conflict prevention
LanguageENG
AuthorPiiparinen, Touko
Publication2008.
Summary / Abstract (Note)If it is correct to say that the UN's policy has been dominated by great powers, then it is also true that the academic debate on the UN's failures in general, and the Rwandan tragedy in particular, has been dominated by an emphasis on Realpolitik , which has limited and precluded analysis of other possible causes of the UN's malfunctions. Power politics alone cannot fully explain why the downfall of `grand strategies' for the UN envisaged in Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali's An Agenda for Peace (1992), most notably conflict prevention, was almost as rapid as their emergence. By drawing upon new empirical evidence from interviews and by reflecting on theories of bureaucratization, this article explores one previously ignored mechanism underlying the failure of the Agenda in general and the Rwandan case in particular, namely bureaucratic rationalization.
`In' analytical NoteEuropean Journal of International Relations Vol. 14, No. 4; Dec 2008: p697-724
Journal SourceEuropean Journal of International Relations Vol. 14, No. 4; Dec 2008: p697-724
Key WordsBureaucratization ;  Conflict Management ;  Conflict Prevention ;  Peace - Enforcement ;  Peacekeeping ;  Rwanda ;  United Nations ;  Bureaucratic Rationalization ;  U N Secretariat