| ID | 085423 |
| Title Proper | Securitizing climate change |
| Other Title Information | international legal implications and obstacles |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Scott, Shirley V |
| Publication | 2008. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | On 17 April 2007 the United Nations Security Council held its first debate on climate change, energy and security. Since then, and despite a number of reports emphasizing the security implications of climate change, there has, at least in diplomatic circles, been a move away from the previous trend towards accepting climate change as a question of international security. This is primarily due to the possibility of the Security Council taking the lead in coordinating global efforts to mitigate, or adapt to, climate change. Developing countries interpret this possibility as a rejection of the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities as incorporated into the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The increasing urgency of taking decisive action means that it is too early to rule out a role for the Council with its coercive powers. Ultimately, however, the success of any international regulations will depend on their political legitimacy. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 21, No. 4; Dec 2008: p603 - 619 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 21, No. 4; Dec 2008: p603 - 619 |
| Key Words | Securitizing ; Climate Change ; International Climate ; Energy ; International Security ; United Nations Security Council ; Legal Implication |