| ID | 085901 |
| Title Proper | Thunder versus enlightenment |
| Other Title Information | response to thunder |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Crowder, George |
| Publication | 2009. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | I thank David Thunder for his stimulating comments.I agree with
him that the issues debated here are important for public policy, but I don't accept that he has presented anjy good reason to reject my case for Enlightenment or autonomy-based liberalism, Thunder makes two main claims:first, that a meaningful right of exit needn't commit us to individual autonomy in the strong Enlightenment sense;second, that value pluralism doesn't generate such a commitment either. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Theory Vol. 37, No. 1; Feb 2009: p.161-166 |
| Journal Source | Political Theory Vol. 37, No. 1; Feb 2009: p.161-166 |
| Key Words | Thunder ; Enlightenment ; Liberalism |