| ID | 086293 |
| Title Proper | Why are revisionist states revisionist |
| Other Title Information | reviving classical realism as an approach to understanding international change |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Rynning, Sten ; Ringsmose, Jens |
| Publication | 2008. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In this article, we argue that Realism recently has eschewed big and important questions of war and peace and that revived Classical Realism can help bring Realism back on track. Modern Realists tend to assume that states are either all status quo players or all revisionists, and the result is a slippery grasp of the sources and dynamics of international change. To revive Classical Realism, we examine three dominant sets of criticism. We notably return to the classical texts of Realism to show that the classics were in fact not reductionist: they did not reduce either systemic or national phenomena (third and second image theory) to human nature (first image). Classical Realists understood the many intricate and delicate connections between these levels, and it is modern era Realists who are reductionists because they reduce explanations to systemic phenomena. We show how Classical Realism can respond in strength to its critics and ask the kind of research questions that again will advance our understanding of international change. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Politics Vol. 45, No.1; January 2008: p19-39 |
| Journal Source | International Politics Vol. 45, No.1; January 2008: p19-39 |
| Key Words | Classical Realism ; Structural Realism ; Revisionism - Status Quo ; International Change ; War - Peace |