| ID | 086937 |
| Title Proper | Writing the world |
| Other Title Information | disciplinary history and beyond |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Bell, Duncan |
| Publication | 2009. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In order to grasp some of the key intellectual developments and trends that shaped the global politics of twentieth century and continue to shape our own world-neo-classical economics, modernization theory, deterrence theory, the democratic peace, among others-it is necessary to explore the history of the human sciences. It is important, in other words, to examine the role of the modern research university in producing and diffusing ideas about the self, society, the economy and world order. International Relations (IR), and political science more generally, played a significant role in this story. In recent years we have seen a growth of interest in the history of IR, though it is still an underdeveloped area of research. Among other things, scholars have shown that many of the foundational myths of the discipline-the views that inform textbook understandings of the past and present-are deeply flawed. This article first surveys this recent work, highlighting its strengths and weaknesses, and then proceeds to offer some thoughts on future directions for research. It identifies a range of questions and topics that have yet to be adequately addressed, and draws on the latest methodological work in intellectual history, highlighting some new interpretative approaches that can enrich scholarship in this area. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Affairs Vol. 85, No. 1; Jan 2009: p.3-22 |
| Journal Source | International Affairs Vol. 85, No. 1; Jan 2009: p.3-22 |
| Key Words | Writing the World ; Disciplinary History ; International Affairs ; Historical Study ; Social Science ; International Relations ; Chaos |