Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1395Hits:19714198Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID086960
Title ProperSocial distance in Bosnia-Herzegovina and the North Caucasus region of Russia
Other Title Informationinter and intra-ethnic attitudes and identities
LanguageENG
AuthorBakke, Kristin M ;  Cao, Xun ;  O'Loughlin, John ;  Ward, Michael D
Publication2009.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article examines attitudinal differences and similarities among ethnic groups in conflict-affected societies. Conventional wisdom tells us that societies that have experienced violent struggles in which individuals of different ethnic groups have (been) mobilized against each other are likely to become polarized along ethnic lines. Indeed, both policy-makers and scholars often assume that such divisions are some of the main challenges that must be overcome to restore peace after war. We comparatively examine this conventional wisdom by mapping dimensions of social distance among 4,000 survey respondents in Bosnia-Herzegovina and the North Caucasus region of Russia. The surveys were carried out in December 2005. Using multidimensional scaling methods, we do not find patterns of clear attitudinal cleavages among members of different ethnic groups in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Nor do we find patterns of clear ethnic division in the North Caucasus, although our social distance matrices reveal a difference between Russians and ethnic minority groups.
`In' analytical NoteNations and Nationalism Vol. 15, No. 2; Apr 2009: p.227-253)
Journal SourceNations and Nationalism Vol. 15, No. 2; Apr 2009: p.227-253)
Key WordsEthnic Conflict ;  Post-Conflict Societies ;  Social Distance ;  Inter-Ethnic Attitudes ;  Bosnia-Herzegovina ;  North Caucasus