| ID | 087362 |
| Title Proper | Challenge of monitoring and evaluation under the new aid modalities |
| Other Title Information | experiences from Rwanda |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Holvoet, Nathalie ; Rombouts, Heidy |
| Publication | 2008. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) are sensitive issues in relations between donor agencies and recipient governments, especially in a time when the responsibility for implementing aid activities is shifting towards recipients. This paper deplores that, so far, donors and recipients have adopted an overly technocratic approach to M&E, largely disregarding broader institutional and systemic issues. Using case study material from Rwanda, we illustrate that assessments regarding the quality of a country's M&E efforts may differ sharply depending upon one's perspective. At the core of the matter is 'the denial of politics', one of the most serious flaws in the new aid paradigm promoted in the OECD's 2005 'Paris Declaration'. We argue that while a narrowly defined technocratic vision of M&E may seem 'politically neutral', in fact it may jeopardise M&E's functions of 'accountability' and 'feedback'. This can eventually undermine the effective implementation of some of the key principles of the 'new aid approach'. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Modern African Studies Vol. 46, No. 4; Dec 2008: p577-602 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Modern African Studies Vol. 46, No. 4; Dec 2008: p577-602 |
| Key Words | Monitoring and Evaluation ; New Aid Modalities ; Experiences From Rwanda ; Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) |