Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:413Hits:20487405Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID087569
Title ProperWhen Are Democratic Friends Unreliable? The Unilateral withdrawal of troops from the `coalition of the willing'
LanguageENG
AuthorTago, Atsushi
Publication2009.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Why do some democracies break their security commitments whereas others do not? This study proposes a research strategy to answer the question by analyzing the timing of unilateral exits from a coalition military operation. Coalition participants typically do not exit until a military mission has been accomplished. However, in the case of the US-led coalition occupying Iraq since May 2003, 16 states have unilaterally withdrawn their armed forces. Despite the danger such defections may cause to the relationship of these states with the USA, why and when do they exit? The author creates a dataset with a state-month unit of analysis that contains information on 37 partner states and applies a Cox proportional hazard model. The study finds that the occurrence of a national election serves as a strong driving force to accelerate an exit from the coalition. An incumbent leader who faces a challenger who opposes military contributions in Iraq would reverse the policy to support the USA and exit the coalition to win an election, even at the risk of damaging a bilateral relationship with the USA. A change in leadership after an election, on the other hand, failed to be a predictor of the timing of defection. Furthermore, results reveal that the division of power within the government and the constitutional rules that enable significant parliamentary control over executive decisions to use force neither delay nor accelerate the timing of withdrawal. To understand the conditions under which democracies break their security commitments, more attention should be paid to election cycles than to a change in leadership and to types of democratic institutional and constitutional arrangements
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Peace Research Vol. 46, No. 2; Mar 2009: p219-234
Journal SourceJournal of Peace Research Vol. 46, No. 2; Mar 2009: p219-234
Key WordsDemocratic Friends - Unreliable ;  Unilateral ;  Withdrawal of Troops ;  Coalition of the Willing ;  Parliamentary Control ;  Democratic Institutional ;  Constitutional Arrangements.