Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1070Hits:18502079Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID087579
Title ProperDomestic judicial institutions and human rights treaty violation
LanguageENG
AuthorPowell, Emilia Justyna ;  Staton, Jeffrey K
Publication2009.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Democratic and autocratic states routinely violate their international agreements protecting human rights. Scholars typically link ratification and compliance behavior theoretically but test their models separately; however, if the behaviors are jointly determined then we should treat them that way empirically. We consider how domestic judiciaries influence the joint choice to ratify and comply with international human rights regimes. Using data on the ratification status of states under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), states' torture practices, and a series of measures of judicial effectiveness, we examine whether legal institutions are likely to constrain state behavior and by implication raise the costs of ratification.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Studies Quarterly Vol. 53, No.1; Mar 2009: p149-174
Journal SourceInternational Studies Quarterly Vol. 53, No.1; Mar 2009: p149-174
Key WordsHuman Rights Treaty ;  International Agreement ;  Judicial Institutions ;  Violation


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text