| ID | 087694 |
| Title Proper | Preemption in the Bush doctrine |
| Other Title Information | a reappraisal |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Tunc, Hakan |
| Publication | 2009. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article argues that the elevation of preemption to a cardinal status in the Bush Doctrine following September 11, 2001 resulted from a larger strategic consideration-to convince rogue states to discontinue their weapons of mass destruction programs and their sponsorship of terrorism. Dismantling the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq as a demonstration of preemptive action was seen as necessary to ensure the forceful and credible conveyance of this message to other rogue states, especially Iran and North Korea. I call this strategic logic behind publicizing preemption, "demonstrative compellence." Because the logic of preemption in the Bush Doctrine relied heavily on the Iraq war and its demonstrative force, it has little relevance to the future conduct of U.S. foreign policy and should not be described as revolutionary. |
| `In' analytical Note | Foreign Policy Analysis Vol. 5, No.1; Jan 2009: p1-6 |
| Journal Source | Foreign Policy Analysis Vol. 5, No.1; Jan 2009: p1-6 |
| Key Words | United States ; Foreign Policy ; Bush Docrtine ; Mass Destruction Pragrams ; Weapon ; Terrorism |