| ID | 088099 |
| Title Proper | Pigs can't fly, or can they? Ontology, scientific realism and the metaphysics of presence in international relations |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Michel, Torsten |
| Publication | 2009. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In recent debates in IR theory a specific trend has evolved which advocates a renewed focus on matters of ontology as a way to overcome or at least to reconceptualise the divides within the field of IR that we encounter especially after the considerable widening of scope after the end of the Cold War. Responding to these claims the article sets out to provide a closer look at the different arguments presented for a renewed concern with ontology and its ramifications. With this task in mind, three particular complexes will be addressed. First, we have to identify the central claims of these new ontological approaches and assess them in respect to coherence and analytic rigour. Secondly, then, we will proceed with identifying the underlying reasons for their shortcomings which as will be shown lie with the misguided concept of ontology. If this conception is properly reworked, can indeed bring new light into otherwise protracted or even deadlocked debates. |
| `In' analytical Note | Review of International Studies Vol. 35, No.2; Apr 2009: p397-419 |
| Journal Source | Review of International Studies Vol. 35, No.2; Apr 2009: p397-419 |
| Key Words | Pigs can't fly ; Ontology ; Scientific Realism ; Metaphysics ; International Relations |