| ID | 088122 |
| Title Proper | Prominence of historical demarcations |
| Other Title Information | westphalia and the new world order |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Sofer, Sasson |
| Publication | 2009. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | It came as no surprise that interest in the temporal dimension of international politics was on the rise at the turn of the millennium. Of no less importance is the prospect for a "historical turn" in international relations theory. This paper attempts to clarify the relationship between historical demarcation and international understanding of epochal change, and the transformation of world order. Two momentous historical demarcations are examined: the Peace of Westphalia, and the New World Order. The paper offers two propositions. First, that the year 1648 remains the most appropriate historical moment to demarcate the beginning of the Westphalian order, and that the attempt to push the historical demarcation to either the late Renaissance, or the nineteenth century, is theoretically and historically counterproductive. Secondly, that the New World Order of 1989-1992 is only the beginning of a transitory period in history with no conclusive shape or substance, and that the term post-Westphalian order is premature. |
| `In' analytical Note | Diplomacy and Statecraft Vol. 20, No.1; Mar 2009:p1-19 |
| Journal Source | Diplomacy and Statecraft Vol. 20, No.1; Mar 2009:p1-19 |
| Key Words | Prominence ; Historical Demarcations ; Westphalia ; New World Order |