Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:370Hits:19948216Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID089345
Title ProperDifferent paths and divergent policies in the UN security system
Other Title InformationBrazil and Mexico in comparative perspective
LanguageENG
AuthorVelázquez, Arturo C Sotomayor
Publication2009.
Summary / Abstract (Note)How can we explain foreign policy variation among UN member states? Brazil and Mexico are the most likely cases for international primacy in the UN system, given their territorial dimension, demographic tendencies, economic importance, geopolitical location and relative weight in Latin America. Yet, despite their structural similarities, their policies and behaviour in the UN system have varied, both in terms of engagement with the Security Council and commitment regarding peacekeeping. By comparing two of Latin America's most influential countries, this study identifies the underlying conditions and mechanisms that explain their differences in behaviour and policy in the UN. In particular, this article analyses and contrasts how geopolitics and civil-military relations in Brazil and Mexico affect their incentives to participate in international organizations and their overall international commitment to peace.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Peacekeeping Vol. 16, No. 3; Jun 2009: p.364 - 378
Journal SourceInternational Peacekeeping Vol. 16, No. 3; Jun 2009: p.364 - 378
Key WordsUN Security System ;  Brazil ;  Mexico ;  Comparative Perspective ;  Economic Importance ;  Geopolitical Location ;  Territorial Dimension ;  International Commitment