Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:445Hits:19929373Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID089527
Title ProperResponsibility to protect and the conflict in Darfur
Other Title Informationthe big let-down
LanguageENG
AuthorBadescu, Cristina G ;  Bergholm, Linnea
Publication2009.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article discusses the international response to the conflict in Darfur from 2003 onwards in order to explore some of the key challenges related to implementing the responsibility to protect (R2P). First, we show that the debates on R2P in connection to Darfur translated into little more substantive action than the pragmatic decision to deploy peace operations with mandates that included civilian protection, as suggested by the African Union (AU) Mission in Sudan (AMIS), and later by the hybrid UN-AU Mission in Darfur (UNAMID). Second, we argue that the international response to Darfur illustrates three major challenges to R2P implementation. These are: political limitations inherent in the R2P framework; moral dilemmas emerging from military action; and tactical challenges, as exemplified by the struggles faced by the AU and the UN in Darfur. We conclude that the international failure to offer meaningful protection in Darfur highlights the need for continued caution and critical analysis of the ways in which R2P is conceptualized and implemented
`In' analytical NoteSecurity Dialogue Vol. 40, No.3; Jun 2009: p287-309
Journal SourceSecurity Dialogue Vol. 40, No.3; Jun 2009: p287-309
Key WordsResponsibility To Protect ;  Darfur ;  Protection of Civilians ;  United Nations ;  African Union