| ID | 089960 |
| Title Proper | To fix or not to fix? how corruptors decide to fix football matches |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Hill, Declan |
| Publication | 2009. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This paper examines the decisions of the internal corruptors in fixing football games. The methodology is a mixture of interviews, database analysis and examination of a specific series of taped phone calls of a corrupt Russian football official. It finds that generally, this type of match-fixing occurs only after a specific point in the season. There are five implicit questions that corruptors must answer: is the game important enough to fix? Is it morally ethical? Can my team win honestly? Can I afford to fix the game? If I am caught is there a high risk of sanctions? The second section of the paper examines the question of who to bribe? The data indicate that out of the three possible options - referees, players and team officials - the best chance of delivering a successful fix are the team officials. The final section is an examination of the use trust, favour banks and guarantors among the team officials who are willing to sell matches. |
| `In' analytical Note | Global Crime Vol. 10, No. 3; Aug 2009: p.157 - 177 |
| Journal Source | Global Crime Vol. 10, No. 3; Aug 2009: p.157 - 177 |
| Key Words | Corruption ; Football ; Organized Crime ; Informal Governance ; Mafia ; Sports |