Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1260Hits:18728446Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID090980
Title ProperIt's not just competitors
Other Title Informationacknowledging and accommodating "interfering busybodies" and their challenges to patent validity
LanguageENG
AuthorWeatherall, Kimberlee
Publication2009.
Summary / Abstract (Note)In patent, institutional design matters, and goals matter to institutional design. This article concerns the institutional design of mechanisms that can be used by third parties to challenge the validity of proposed or granted patents in the patent office-oppositions, revocations and similar processes. This article traces the various goals of these mechanisms, and how those goals have changed over time. It argues that recent economic and legal literature, which has influenced proposals for reforming these systems, is altogether too neat and tidy, treating public interest participants as interfering busybodies. It is better to acknowledge and embrace groups like Peer to Patent and the Public Patent Foundation, and think about how, in the long term, we can adjust aspects of the patent system to incorporate public input without too much sacrifice to politics and uncertainty.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of World Intellectual Property Vol. 12, No. 5; Sep 2009: p500-523
Journal SourceJournal of World Intellectual Property Vol. 12, No. 5; Sep 2009: p500-523
Key WordsAdministrative Procedures ;  Dispute Settlement ;  Patents ;  Law - Economics