| ID | 091009 |
| Title Proper | From positive neutrality to partisanship |
| Other Title Information | how and why the Armenian political parties took sides in lebanese politics in the post-taif period (1989-present) |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Geukjian, Ohannes |
| Publication | 2009. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article examines the policy of the Armenian political parties in Lebanon in light of the Taif agreement in 1989 that ended the Lebanese civil war and granted the Armenian community more political rights. The Armenian parties (Dashnak, Hunchak and Ramgavar) in the post-Taif period were obliged to abandon the policy of positive neutrality that they adopted from 1975 to 1989, and took sides with various Lebanese parties to protect the communal interests that the consociational structure of the state had allowed them. However, the Armenian parties were not united over the goal of maintaining the Armenian bloc inside parliament. As they chose different policies to pursue communal interests they took sides with the ruling majority and the anti-government opposition. The Armenians were criticized by some Christian politicians for their partisanship and were expected to maintain their traditional neutrality in Lebanese politics. It is very likely that the Armenians will return to their neutral policy and support the President and the government once their group rights are protected. |
| `In' analytical Note | Middle Eastern Studies Vol. 45, No. 5; Sep 2009: p739-767 |
| Journal Source | Middle Eastern Studies Vol. 45, No. 5; Sep 2009: p739-767 |
| Key Words | Neutrality ; America - Politics ; Politics - America |