Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:841Hits:20012426Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID091284
Title ProperWinners and Losers
Other Title InformationFrance, the United States, and the end of the cold war
LanguageENG
AuthorBozo, Frederic
Publication2009.
Summary / Abstract (Note)In July 1990, a troubled Hubert Védrine, François Mitterrand's strategic adviser and spokesman, wrote to Zbigniew Brzezinski. He was frustrated with an interview that the former U.S. national security adviser under Jimmy Carter had given to a leading French daily newspaper a few days before. In the interview (Moscow had just given its final green light to German unification by accepting that Germany would remain a full North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member), Brzezinski, a widely respected pundit, had declared that "for many years, we have known that the end of the Cold War would make two winners: the United States and Germany, and two losers: the Soviet Union and France."1 Responding to what in his eyes was a "debatable" viewpoint "to say the least," Védrine argued that France, since General de Gaulle in the 1960s and under Mitterrand throughout the 1980s, had in fact made persistent efforts to overcome the Cold War and its consequences. Denying that its policies had been premised on the enduring division of Germany, he emphasized that "the German unification process had unfolded in accordance with what the French President had wished as early as July 1989." In any case, Védrine concluded, it made no sense to designate victors and vanquished in the Cold War.
`In' analytical NoteDiplomatic History Vol. 33, No. 5; Nov 2009: p.927-956
Journal SourceDiplomatic History Vol. 33, No. 5; Nov 2009: p.927-956
Key WordsWinners ;  Losers ;  France ;  United States ;  Cold War ;  NATO ;  Germany ;  U.S. National Security ;  George W Bush