Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:384Hits:19958753Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID091614
Title ProperTarget concessions in the shadow of intervention
LanguageENG
AuthorYuen, Amy
Publication2009.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Why do targets sometimes make concessions when third parties offer assistance? Both the extended deterrence and alliance literatures point to unreliable third parties to explain deterrence failure and target acquiescence. On the other hand, the alliance literature also suggests that third parties present a moral-hazard situation in which targets will behave less prudently when they have outside support. Without dismissing the importance of these dynamics, I demonstrate that targets will still make concessions when intervention is certain, and that interveners do not always embolden targets in crisis situations. Counterintuitively, interveners alter the bargaining situation, shifting the bargaining space so that conceding is more attractive than war for the target state. Instead of emboldening targets, third parties deter larger demands and produce settlement outcomes that reduce the burden on the target.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 53, No. 5; Oct 2009: p.745-773
Journal SourceJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 53, No. 5; Oct 2009: p.745-773
Key WordsThird-Party Intervention ;  Bargaining ;  moral Hazard ;  Deterrence ;  Formal Model