| ID | 092443 |
| Title Proper | looking/not looking dilemma |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Moller, Frank |
| Publication | 2009. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | When confronted with images of war and other forms of human suffering, not looking is not an option, not only because we are permanently exposed to images but also because it would not seem to be a morally tenable position. However, looking at images of human suffering is often said to prolong this very suffering and to fix human subjects as victims. Especially when acts of violence have been committed in order to produce images of these very acts the relationship between viewing the images and participating in the acts of violence qua viewer appears to be uncomfortably close indeed. Thus, looking is not an option, either. This article, in the first part, engages with standard criticisms of photography, especially with accusations according to which photographs aestheticise that which they depict and desensitise their viewers. In the second part it discusses Alfredo Jaar's and Jeff Wall's work in order to show possible ways to circumvent the looking/not looking dilemma. |
| `In' analytical Note | Review of International Studies Vol. 35, No. 4; Oct 2009: p.781-794 |
| Journal Source | Review of International Studies Vol. 35, No. 4; Oct 2009: p.781-794 |
| Key Words | Looking Dilemma ; Dilemma ; War ; Violence |