Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:822Hits:19987322Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID092551
Title ProperResearch, identities, and praxis
Other Title Informationthe tensions of integrating identity into the field experience
LanguageENG
AuthorThompson, Marshall
Publication2009.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Scientists seek to participate in the collective process of cumulative knowledge building. As scientists, we are bound to the principle of objective neutrality in the assessment of our data and in the formulation of our inferences and conclusions. However, the production of knowledge does not need to be, and some would say cannot be, a valueless process, devoid of opinion. The imperatives for the investigator are intellectual honesty, transparency in research, and objectivity in the assessment of data. If value judgments are accepted as permissible it is then worthwhile to discuss the relationships between the investigator's identity, those value judgments, and the design and conduct of research. Indeed, investigators possess multiple identities; these multiple identities may, at various times and places, aid or impede the research process. Moreover, these intersectional identities, and the inconsistency with which these identities are granted status in various environments, leave the researcher well positioned to explore social stratification, hierarchies of power, and inequality.
`In' analytical NotePolitical Science and Politics Vol. 42, No. 2; Apr 2009: p325-328
Journal SourcePolitical Science and Politics Vol. 42, No. 2; Apr 2009: p325-328
Key WordsResearch ;  Identities ;  Praxis ;  Field Work