| ID | 093096 |
| Title Proper | Memory on trial |
| Other Title Information | constructing and contesting the rape of nanking at the international military tribunal for the far East, 1946-1948 |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Sedgwick, James Burnham |
| Publication | 2009. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The spectre of the 1937 'Rape of Nanking' continues to haunt China and Japan. Sixty years ago in Tokyo, the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE) announced its definitive 'judgement' of what happened in Nanking. This judgement purported to be intractable. The legal process used to reach it produced a disputed picture instead. The resulting narrative confusion continues to inform how memory of Nanjing is shaped, used and contested. This paper explores the construction of 'Rape of Nanking' narratives at the IMTFE. By demonstrating the inherently contested nature of narratives produced by adversarial legal proceedings, it argues that using courts as a panacea for postwar restoration and as validators of traumatic narratives is both short-sighted and ineffective. The IMTFE exemplifies the inadequacy of trial-based post-conflict reconciliation. It is hoped that the lessons learned from Tokyo's limitations will benefit the ongoing quest for tenable models of international justice. |
| `In' analytical Note | Modern Asian Studies Vol. 43, No. 5; Sep 2009: p1229-1254 |
| Journal Source | Modern Asian Studies Vol. 43, No. 5; Sep 2009: p1229-1254 |
| Key Words | Memory ; Rape ; International Military Tribunal ; Far East ; Historiography |