Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1309Hits:18752463Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID093681
Title ProperStrengthening international courts and the early settlement of disputes
LanguageENG
AuthorGilligan, Michael ;  Johns, Leslie ;  Rosendorff, B Peter
Publication2010.
Summary / Abstract (Note)How does variation in the strength of a court's jurisdiction and enforcement affect strategic behavior by states involved in international disputes? The authors construct a formal model and identify three important ways that legal institutions can have a deleterious effect on international cooperation by magnifying the bargaining problems arising from incomplete information about the quality of the legal claims. First, strong courts create less information revelation in pretrial bargaining. Second, strong courts reduce the likelihood of pretrial settlements between states. Third, strong courts lead to more brinksmanship over high-value assets, which leads to conflict if the court refuses to intervene. The authors argue that a key policy implication of their model is that attempts to strengthen international courts must be accompanied by increased precision of international law to ameliorate the deleterious effects of strong courts.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 54, No. 1; Feb 2010: p. 5-38
Journal SourceJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 54, No. 1; Feb 2010: p. 5-38
Key WordsDispute Settlement ;  Enforcement ;  International Court ;  International Organization ;  Jurisdiction


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text