Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:417Hits:19937562Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID093793
Title ProperDying for the state
Other Title Informationthe missing just war question?
LanguageENG
AuthorBaron, Ilan Zvi
Publication2010.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article introduces the problem of having to risk one's life for the state in war, asking first why this question is no longer asked in the just war literature and then suggesting five issues that relate to this question: 1) that of individual consent, 2) whether or not any state can be justified in obliging its citizens in this regard and whether or not the type of government is important, 3) whether or not the problem of the obligation differs between conscript and volunteer armies, 4) the problem of political obligation and how any individual could be justifiably obliged to risk his or her life for the state in war, and 5) the question of whether a citizen may be obliged to go into any war. The argument is that these questions are no longer given much attention in the just war literature because of the way that the concept of proper authority has come to be understood. The article concludes by suggesting that the problem of the 'obligation to die' should be included in our understanding and use of just war theory and the ethics of war.
`In' analytical NoteReview of International Studies Vol. 36, No. 1; Jan 2010: p.215-234
Journal SourceReview of International Studies Vol. 36, No. 1; Jan 2010: p.215-234
Key WordsWar Literature ;  War Theory ;  Ethics of War ;  War


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text