| ID | 094422 |
| Title Proper | Transition from single-party dominance? new data from Malaysia |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Case, William |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Leading theories of transitions from single-party dominant systems begin with economic crisis, the party's loss of patronage resources, and elite-level defections. The multiparty elections that are then held exert no independent effect, but instead register neutrally the party's decline and the democratization of politics. This article, however, shifts attention from the dominant party to citizens and elections in noncrisis conditions. It argues that citizens assess on key dimensions the dominant party's legitimacy or worthiness of support. Further, where they grow critical of its policy outputs, they scrutinize more closely its conformity to procedures. And as they anticipate that their voting preferences will be thwarted by electoral manipulations, they vote in protest, perhaps producing a "liberalizing electoral outcome." Elections, then, do not simply indicate the dominant party's decline. By deepening alienation, they help citizens to cause it. Analysis is set in Malaysia, long an exemplar of single-party dominance, but recently a case in which the government was dealt a striking electoral setback. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of East Asian Studies Vol. 10, No. 1; Jan-Apr 2010: p.91-126 |
| Journal Source | Journal of East Asian Studies Vol. 10, No. 1; Jan-Apr 2010: p.91-126 |
| Key Words | Single - Party Dominance ; Competitive Authoritarianism ; Political Legitimacy ; Elections ; Ethnicity ; Democratic Transition ; Malaysia |