| ID | 094560 |
| Title Proper | Entropy and the trajectory of world politics |
| Other Title Information | why polarity has become less meaningful |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Schweller, Randall L |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The random and indeterminate nature of the current unipolar world suggests a condition of increasing entropy. There are two reasons for this claim. First, relative capability advantages under unipolarity do not translate as easily as they once did into power and influence over others. Second, systemic constraint is a property that limits actors' freedom of action by imposing costs and benefits on certain kinds of actions. Unlike past multipolar and bipolar systems, the current unipolar system exerts only weak, if any, systemic constraints on the unipolar power and all other actors as well. Thus, polarity has become a largely meaningless concept. Today, system process rather than structure best explains international politics, and this process is one of entropy. Finally, I suggest two pathways from unipolarity to a more balanced system: one is fairly consistent with standard balance-of-power realism but adds an ideational component; the other restores equilibrium by means of entropy. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 23, No. 1; Mar 2010: p145-163 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 23, No. 1; Mar 2010: p145-163 |
| Key Words | World Politics ; Polarity ; Entropy ; Trajectory ; Thermodynamics |