| ID | 095268 |
| Title Proper | Lost chance or lost horizon |
| Other Title Information | strategic opportunity and escalation risk in the Korean war, April-July 1951 |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Jackson, Colin F |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article examines three questions surrounding American attempts at war termination in 1951. Was there a militarily feasible 'lost chance' for UN forces to advance to the narrow neck of the Korean peninsula? If so, why did American decisionmakers decline to pursue it? What effect might such operations have had on the course of the war and subsequent American thinking on limited war? It concludes that the US missed a critical opportunity to conclude the war on more favorable terms; that the American decision to forgo amphibious operations in June 1951 had less to do with military calculations than with the domestic political firestorm that followed MacArthur's relief; and that the 'lost chance' not only increased the cost and duration of the Korean War, but encouraged subsequent decision makers to overstate the risks of intra-war escalation and understate the risks of premature, de-escalation. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol. 33, No. 2; Apr 2010: p255-289 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol. 33, No. 2; Apr 2010: p255-289 |
| Key Words | Escalation ; Limited War ; Korean War ; Horizon ; Strategic Opportunity ; Escalation Risk |