Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1593Hits:19783788Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID095297
Title ProperWorst of all worlds
Other Title Informationelectoral reform and Britain's 2009 European elections
LanguageENG
AuthorKilly, Richard
Publication2010.
Summary / Abstract (Note)At the 2009 European elections, Britain again elected its MEPs under the 'closed list' system of proportional representation (PR)-the third time it had done so since 1999. This article looks at claims that these elections vindicated PR by producing a 'fairer' relationship between the parties' share of votes and their share of seats, a truer reflection of diverse political allegiance in modern Britain, and (thanks to multi-member constituencies) a more efficient and sensitive system for representing voters. However, the article will also inspect the idea that the case for electoral reform was gravely weakened by the 2009 Euro elections. It will recall how PR again failed to boost turnout, again employed a method of counting that most voters did not understand, and again involved constituencies too large for meaningful representation. Furthermore, it will recall that PR allowed the election of two MEPs from the far-right British National Party. (With just 6% of votes, it is unlikely that the BNP would have secured seats under Britain's traditional electoral system.) The article will argue that, as a result, PR has had a centrifugal effect on the British party system and, potentially, a polarising effect on our political culture. Consequently, the article will assert that, owing to the success of the BNP in 2009, arguments about PR for Westminster have been 'ideologically neutralised'. The article will thus suggest that we can now take a more objective view of hung Parliaments and coalitions (the likely effects of PR at general elections), free from the assumption that they entrench centrist governments and progressive politics.
`In' analytical NotePolitical Quarterly Vol. 81, No. 1; Jan-Mar 2010: p99-106
Journal SourcePolitical Quarterly Vol. 81, No. 1; Jan-Mar 2010: p99-106
Key WordsElections ;  Proportional Representation ;  Party System ;  Representation ;  Britain ;  Europe - Election