| ID | 095490 |
| Title Proper | Fourth wave in deterrence research |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Knopf, Jeffrey W |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Following the end of the Cold War and accelerating after 9/11, a new wave of research on deterrence has emerged. Building on an earlier characterization by Robert Jervis, this work is here designated the fourth wave. The fourth wave reflects efforts to grapple with the change from a relatively symmetrical situation of mutual deterrence that characterized the Cold War to the asymmetric threats that dominate the current security environment for the United States and many other states. Despite widespread doubts that have been expressed in public about whether the most threatening actors today are deterrable, the fourth wave is nearly unanimous in finding that deterrence remains relevant, even with respect to terrorism. Beyond this basic consensus, the fourth wave also includes vigorous debates, particularly regarding alternative strategies for dealing with WMD-seeking rogue states. Because few analysts expect deterrence to be foolproof, especially in dealing with non-state actors, much of the work has focused on finding ways to improve the prospects for deterrence at the margins. Overall, the most important result of the fourth wave has been to reveal the value of moving toward a broader concept of deterrence that incorporates non-nuclear and even non-military sources of leverage. Proposals to use information and discourse as bases for deterrence are especially innovative and worthy of further research. |
| `In' analytical Note | Contemporary Security Policy Vol. 31, No. 1; Apr 2010: p.1 - 33 |
| Journal Source | Contemporary Security Policy Vol. 31, No. 1; Apr 2010: p.1 - 33 |
| Key Words | Deterrence Research ; Cold War ; 9/11 ; Fourth Wave ; United States ; WMD |