| ID | 096200 |
| Title Proper | SRSG mediation in civil wars |
| Other Title Information | revisiting the spoiler debate |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Zahar, Marie-Joëlle |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In transitions from war to peace, mediators and other foreign interveners identify "spoilers" as one of the main threats to peace processes. Profiling would-be spoilers and developing appropriate typologies to prevent them from using violence has become prevailing wisdom at the United Nations and beyond. This article argues that the spoiler typology has limited utility as a tool to guide the action of mediators and help them devise winning strategies. It asserts that there are no fixed spoiler types; actors' propensity to use violence depends on conditions that affect their capability and their opportunity structure. It uses the twin notions of capability and opportunity to identify ripe situations for mediation and for peace implementation. It also utilizes these notions to reflect on the appropriateness of various strategies that the international community can use in its attempt to bring about peace to war-torn countries. The article suggests that it is not actors, but contexts, that need to be profiled. Furthermore, international custodians do not simply react to situations; they have a profound impact on shaping the opportunity structure of civil war actors, and their willingness to implement policies that increase the cost of violence goes a long way toward determining whether or not local actors will use violence. |
| `In' analytical Note | Global Governance Vol. 16, No. 2; Apr-Jun 2010: p265-280 |
| Journal Source | Global Governance Vol. 16, No. 2; Apr-Jun 2010: p265-280 |
| Key Words | Spoilers ; Violence ; Mediation ; Civil Wars ; SRSG |