| ID | 096253 |
| Title Proper | G20 as an improvised crisis committee and/or a contested 'steering committee' for the world |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Cooper, Andrew F |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Arguably the most important catalytic effect of the 'Great Recession' of 2008-2009 has been the creation of the G20 at the leaders' level. As a form of improvised diplomacy the G20 merits extensive scrutiny, revealing as it does the degree of adaptation possible in the international system. The G20 links a significant ideational component, a new dynamic between established and emerging powers, and a complex set of issues. The innovative quality of the G20, however, rests on two very distinct strands of activity and tests of accomplishments. The G20 can be viewed as a 'recession-buster' with a vital but momentary purpose. Alternatively, the G20 can be taken to be an embedded 'steering committee' for the world. Both of these interpretations have validity. The crisis committee scenario highlights a technical regulatory-driven agenda. The steering committee scenario by way of contrast showcases the connection between the G20 and a new type of global settlement. Passing the test as a crisis committee hinges on very specific deliverables. Passing the test as a steering committee is even more demanding as any move toward a new state-specific 'concert' is highly contested. This article examines these debates, locating the G20 in a historical/comparative perspective and in terms of the wider context of shifting power structure at the beginning of the twenty-first century. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Affairs Vol. 86, No. 3; May 2010: p.741-757 |
| Journal Source | International Affairs Vol. 86, No. 3; May 2010: p.741-757 |
| Key Words | G20 ; Great Recession - 2008-2009 ; Crisis Committee ; Great Recession - 2008–2009 |