| ID | 096298 |
| Title Proper | Comparing gender, institutions and political behavior |
| Other Title Information | toward an integrated theoretical framework |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Kittilson, Miki Caul |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Integrating the behavioral and institutional approaches to comparative politics will provide a more comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding why differences in political engagement among men and women vary cross-nationally and cross-temporally. This essay advances the argument that gender-related policies and institutions are not only outcomes in the political process, but also exert powerful influence over citizens' interests, values, and perceptions of politics. This policy feedback loop has implications for a wide array of political attitudes and activities-from political interest to running for elected office. Specifically, the adoption and expansion of national policies on issues such as equal wages, childcare provision, paid maternity leave, and violence against women carry important messages to the electorate: Issues that disproportionately affect women, long considered private, have become important national policy choices. |
| `In' analytical Note | Perspectives on Politics Vol. 8, No. 1; Mar 2010: p. 217-222 |
| Journal Source | Perspectives on Politics Vol. 8, No. 1; Mar 2010: p. 217-222 |
| Key Words | Comparing Gender ; Political Behavior ; Integrated Theoretical Framework ; Comparative Politics |