| ID | 096383 |
| Title Proper | Subfield Hockey |
| Other Title Information | a reaction to Matthew Moore's national survey of political theorists |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Ferguson, Kennan |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This survey's importance comes not from what it informs us about political theory as a field, but rather from the function it serves within debates over the component areas of the field of political science. Rather than answering whether political theory "belongs" within political science (an unanswerable question), the survey uses quantification of qualitative experience and data collection to consolidate political theory as a subfield. Thus success of this project relies upon and reinforces disciplinary norms, operating as a process that attempts to bring a normative political theory into existence. The rank ordering of departments, journals, and individual theorists proves appealing not only for the competitive, horse-race valuation of those people and institutions, but also for how they ultimately resist this project by showing the anti-normative heart of political theory: an important and useful survey indeed. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Science and Politics Vol. 43, No. 2; Apr 2010: p.275-277 |
| Journal Source | Political Science and Politics Vol. 43, No. 2; Apr 2010: p.275-277 |
| Key Words | Subfield Hockey ; Matthew Moore's National Survey ; Political Theorists ; Political Theory |