| ID | 096549 |
| Title Proper | Theocracy and autonomy in medieval Islamic and Jewish philosophy |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Fraenkel, Carlos |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | According to both contemporary intuitions and scholarly opinion, autonomy is something specifically modern. It is certainly taken to be incompatible with religions like Islam and Judaism, if these are invested with political power. Both religions are seen as centered on a divine Law (sharî 'a, viz., torah) which prescribes what we may and may not do, promising reward for obedience and threatening punishment for disobedience. Not we, but God makes the rules. This picture is in important ways misleading. There is, I argue, a substantive intellectual tradition, going back to Plato's Laws, which takes the purpose of a theocracy-a community governed by God through the intermediary of a divine Law-to be promoting rational autonomy, conceived as (1) the ability to rationally determine what is in one's best interest and (2) having the motivation to live accordingly. Among the most important representatives of this intellectual tradition are medieval Muslim and Jewish philosophers. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Theory Vol. 38, No. 3; Jun 2010: p.340-366 |
| Journal Source | Political Theory Vol. 38, No. 3; Jun 2010: p.340-366 |
| Key Words | Theocracy ; Autonomy ; Medieval Islamic ; Jewish Philosophy ; Islam ; Judaism |