| ID | 096551 |
| Title Proper | Origin and character of Hannah Arendt's theory of judgment |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Marshall, David L |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Hannah Arendt's theory of judgment has been the object of considerable interest in the last three decades. Political theorists in particular have hoped to find in her theory of judgment a viable account of how diverse modern societies can sustain a commitment to dialogue in the absence of shared basic principles. A number of scholars, however, have critiqued Arendt's account of judgment in various ways. This article examines criticisms from Richard Bernstein, Ronald Beiner, George Kateb, Jürgen Habermas, and Linda Zerilli. On the basis of early sources from Arendt's manuscripts and Denktagebuch that have not been used in these debates, this article contends that Arendt's position on judgment can be defended against these critics and that her account warrants further exploration. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Theory Vol. 38, No. 3; Jun 2010: p.367-393 |
| Journal Source | Political Theory Vol. 38, No. 3; Jun 2010: p.367-393 |
| Key Words | Hannah Arendt's Theory ; Political Theorists ; Judgment ; Richard Bernstein ; Ronald Beiner ; George Kateb ; Hannah Arendt’s Theory |