| ID | 096597 |
| Title Proper | Discussion of Erik Martinez Kuhonta, Dan Slater, and Tuong Vu's Southeast Asia in political science |
| Other Title Information | theory, region, and qualitative analysis |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Pepinsky, Thomas B ; Geddes, Barbara ; McCargo, Duncan ; Robison, Richard |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Comparative politics has witnessed periodic debates between proponents of contextually sensitive area studies research and others who view such work as unscientific, noncumulative, or of limited relevance for advancing broader social science knowledge. In Southeast Asia in Political Science: Theory, Region, and Qualitative Analysis, edited by Erik Martinez Kuhonta, Dan Slater, and Tuong Vu, a group of bright, young Southeast Asianists argue that contextually sensitive research in Southeast Asia using qualitative research methods has made fundamental and lasting contributions to comparative politics. They challenge other Southeast Asianists to assert proudly the contributions that their work has made and urge the rest of the comparative politics discipline to take these contributions seriously. This symposium includes four short critical reviews of Southeast Asia in Political Science by political scientists representing diverse scholarly traditions. The reviews address both the methodological and the theoretical orientations of the book and are followed by a response from the editors. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of East Asian Studies Vol. 10, No. 2; May-Aug 2010: p171-208 |
| Journal Source | Journal of East Asian Studies Vol. 10, No. 2; May-Aug 2010: p171-208 |
| Key Words | Comparative Politics ; Qualitative Methods Theory ; Southeast Asia |