ID | 096752 |
Title Proper | Evolution of counterterrorism |
Other Title Information | will tactics trump strategy? |
Language | ENG |
Author | Cronin, Audrey Kurth |
Publication | 2010. |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | Counterterrorism efforts over the past five years have yielded important progress against Al-Qaeda abroad, even with heightened anxiety about the threat of attacks at home. There was certainly no 'clash of civilizations'; violent Salafism engendered a muscular backlash in Muslim-majority countries, which threatened Al-Qaeda's ability to recruit and even survive. At the same time, the policies of major states became more effective and better aligned. A nascent counterterrorism coalition emerged with unprecedented sharing of intelligence, operations and deradicalization techniques (especially bilaterally). In the face of these developments, a defensive Al-Qaeda scrambled to exploit vulnerabilities so as to regain a mental edge. The result was two tactical setbacks for the allies: first, Al-Qaeda and its associates redoubled their efforts to kill civilians on western soil, focusing particularly on radicalized home grown amateurs; and second, they leaned more heavily on reinvigorated affiliates, some of whom tried to project force beyond their local operating areas for the first time. As a result, terrorist operations in the US and UK were more frequent, unpredictable and unsophisticated, but nonetheless potentially lethal. As the period drew to a close, the crucial question was whether the two western allies could maintain their nerve, luck, skill and sufficient equilibrium to both fend off a domestic attack and plan for an effective strategic response in the event that one occurred. |
`In' analytical Note | International Affairs Vol. 86, No. 4; Jul 2010: p.837-856 |
Journal Source | International Affairs Vol. 86, No. 4; Jul 2010: p.837-856 |
Key Words | Counterterrorism ; Trump Strategy ; Al - Qaeda ; United States ; United Kingdom |