| ID | 097366 |
| Title Proper | Why some states participate in UN peace missions while others do not |
| Other Title Information | an analysis of civil-military relations and its effects on Latin America's contributions to peacekeeping operations |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Velazquez, Arturo C Sotomayor |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Why do some states deploy troops to support UN missions while others do not? Although short from war, peacekeeping entails a military dimension of foreign policy in which uniformed personnel is deployed to accomplish diplomatic and political means. As such, decisions to commit troops to UN operations must have the implicit support of the armed forces in order to take place. Yet, military backing for peacekeeping participation is not universal; some military institutions are more willing to join such missions than others. This article accounts for variations in terms of peacekeeping commitments by focusing on security doctrines and the degree of integration between military and foreign policy roles. It hypothesizes that countries with externally oriented doctrines and integrated foreign and defense policies are more likely to commit troops to the UN than countries with national security doctrines and segregated military and foreign policy roles. Using evidence from the Latin American region, the paper suggests that the decision to engage in UN operations is the result of doctrinal policies and bureaucratic infighting. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Studies Vol. 19, No. 1; Jan-Mar 2010: p.160 - 195 |
| Journal Source | Security Studies Vol. 19, No. 1; Jan-Mar 2010: p.160 - 195 |
| Key Words | Civil - Military Relations ; UN Peace Missions ; Latin America ; Peacekeeping Operations ; Security Doctrines |