Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:338Hits:19893417Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID097428
Title ProperComparative analysis for energy production processes (EPPs)
Other Title Informationsustainable energy futures for Turkey
LanguageENG
AuthorTalinli, Ilhan ;  Topuz, Emel ;  Akbay, Mehmet Uygar
Publication2010.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This study presents a comparative analysis of three different energy production process (EPP) scenarios for Turkey. Main goal is to incorporate the prioritization criteria for the assessment of various energy policies for power alternatives, and evaluating these policies against these criteria. The three types of EPPs reviewed in this study are: electricity production from wind farms in the future, existing coal-based thermal power plants and planned nuclear power plants. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is utilized to assess the main and sub-factors of EPPs. Main factors such as economic, technical, social and environmental are assigned in first level of the AHP. The importance weights of factors are produced and priority values with realistic numbers are obtained using Fuzzy-AHP Chang's Model. Priority value for wind energy was determined as two times higher than the others when making the ultimate decision. On aggregate, importance weights of environmental (0.68) and social (0.69) factors make wind power leader. Sub-factors such as public acceptance, waste-emission and environmental impacts cause both nuclear and thermal power to have the lowest priority numbers. Additionally, the CO2 emissions trade was determined to be a very important criterion associated with both economic and environmental factors according to Kyoto Protocol. This study concludes that Turkey's existing thermal power stations should gradually be substituted by renewable energy options according to a schedule of Turkish energy policies in future.
`In' analytical NoteEnergy Policy Vol. 38, No. 8; Aug 2010: p.4479-4488
Journal SourceEnergy Policy Vol. 38, No. 8; Aug 2010: p.4479-4488
Key WordsEnergy Production Process ;  Multi - Criteria Analysis ;  Environmental Impact Assessment