ID | 097914 |
Title Proper | Containing the Kantian revolutions |
Other Title Information | a theoretical analysis of the neo-conservative critique of global liberal governance |
Language | ENG |
Author | Drolet, Jean-Francois |
Publication | 2010. |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article examines the neo-conservative critique of global liberal governance. It provides a theoretically oriented assessment of the neo-conservative case against international law and human rights regimes, and draws out the main political and ethical implications for American democracy and American foreign policy. It is argued that the neo-conservative critique of global governance rests upon an interpretation of the normative order that weaves together democracy, individual rights and national autonomy through a volatile identity politics which is fundamentally at odds with both the pluralist character of 'Westphalian diplomacy' and the universal order of rights envisaged by advocates of global governance. More than just the policy autonomy of the US, what is really at stakes in those debates for neo-conservatives is the whole structure of cultural and socio-economic interests that is tied to the substantive interpretation of democracy upon which their domestic commitments to neo-liberal capitalism and liberal freedoms are predicated. |
`In' analytical Note | Review of International Studies Vol. 36, No. 3; Jul 2010: p.533-560 |
Journal Source | Review of International Studies Vol. 36, No. 3; Jul 2010: p.533-560 |
Key Words | Kantian Revolutions ; Global Liberal Governance ; International Law ; Human Rights ; American Democracy ; American Foreign Policy ; Global Governance ; Socio - Economic Interests ; Liberal Capitalism ; Liberal Freedoms |