| ID | 097925 |
| Title Proper | Ethics of autoethnography |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Dauphinee, Elizabeth |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article queries the place of autoethnography in the study of International Relations as it relates to questions of truth, power, and ethics. The traditional denial of the authorial presence of the self in IR scholarship has been increasingly challenged in recent years, and autoethnography is perhaps the most obvious example of this. This article utilises autoethnography to explore some of the pitfalls and dilemmas associated with the approach - particularly the dangers surrounding 'standpoint' epistemologies, and the need to continue to distinguish between scholarship and storytelling. The article does not dismiss these concerns, but seeks to illustrate the ways in which the discipline is already engaged in storytelling as it narrates its own history and development. At the same time, the article seeks to 'guard against a generation of novelists' whose training would inevitably devolve into a question of crafting the 'prettiest sentence.' Mindful of these concerns, the article nevertheless seeks to demonstrate the ethical value of autoethnography in its exploration of the limitations of academic voice and its impact on those we write, the truths we are able to recognise and transcribe, and the ways in which the academic voice silences the self, who is forced to hide or minimise the often very personal motivations for engaging in IR scholarship. It argues that purposeful autoethnography should have a place among the diverse approaches to IR. |
| `In' analytical Note | Review of International Studies Vol. 36, No. 3; Jul 2010: p.799-818 |
| Journal Source | Review of International Studies Vol. 36, No. 3; Jul 2010: p.799-818 |
| Key Words | Ethics ; Autoethnography ; International Relations |