Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:590Hits:20276238Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID098382
Title ProperWhen universal and legally secured property rights are not necessary for market Growth
Other Title Informationthe Politics and reality of Chinese urban redevelopment 2002-2005
LanguageENG
AuthorPercy, Christian
Publication2010.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This study uses developments in China's urban housing market from 2002 to 2005 to engage with a hypothesis drawn from the Rule of Law discourse, that secure property rights across market participants are necessary for effective market growth. This particular market has been characterized by both significant demand-side growth and weak property rights for private home owners, contradicting the hypothesis. There are various theoretical objections to this hypothesis, but by focusing on a specific market, I isolate key factors to rephrase the hypothesis, emphasising pragmatism and structural market predictability as a substitute for formal and universal property rights. Indeed, formally weak property rights may in this instance have been a partial and temporary driver of market growth.
`In' analytical NoteEast Asia: An International Quaterly Vol. 27, No. 3; Sep 2010: p245-265
Journal SourceEast Asia: An International Quaterly Vol. 27, No. 3; Sep 2010: p245-265
Key WordsRule - Law ;  Economics ;  Chinese Legal Reform ;  Property Market ;  Urban Renewal ;  Rights Hypothesis ;  Property Rights ;  China