| ID | 098882 |
| Title Proper | Security, profit or shadow of the past |
| Other Title Information | explaining the security strategies of microstates |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Wivel, Anders ; Oest, Kajsa Ji Noe |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Which factors determine the security strategies of microstates? Many microstates are either secluded island states or have very close political, economic and cultural ties to a larger neighbouring 'protector state'. They have had, therefore, little use for more traditional alliance arrangements. However, the patterns of security cooperation between states have shifted as the significance of flexible ad-hoc coalition-building as a means to coordinate international interventions has increased. Consequently, the strategic security challenges and opportunities for microstates have been transformed. Focusing on the Operation Iraqi Freedom coalition, this article explores some of these challenges and opportunities. Three hypotheses regarding the decisions made by the respective microstates to join international ad-hoc coalitions are studied: (1) participation provides increased security, (2) participation provides economic gains, and (3) participation reflects the lessons of past security challenges. The explanatory powers of each hypothesis are examined using a comparative case study of 11 Pacific microstates. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 23, No. 3; Sep 2010: p429-453 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 23, No. 3; Sep 2010: p429-453 |
| Key Words | Security ; Profit ; Shadow ; Security Strategies ; Microstates ; Iraq |