| ID | 099119 |
| Title Proper | Framing, public diplomacy, and anti-Americanism in central Asia |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Schatz, Edward ; Levine, Renan |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The US State Department increasingly relies on efforts of public diplomacy to improve America's image abroad. We test the theoretical efficacy of these efforts through an experiment. Participants were recruited in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. All but those participants randomly assigned to a control group read a quote about religious tolerance and pluralism in the United States. We varied the attribution of this quote to President Bush, to an unnamed US Ambassador, to an ordinary American, or to no one. We then asked respondents a battery of questions about their opinions of the United States before and after a long discussion with other participants about the United States. We find that the identity of the messenger matters, as those who read the quote attributed to Bush tended to have lower opinions of the United States. After the discussion, these views partially dissipated. Post-discussion views were more heavily influenced by how other participants viewed the United States. After controlling for the source and location of the discussion, when the discussion took place among people with more positive initial views of the United States, views of the United States improved. However, when there was a large range of views in the discussion, post-discussion views of the United States were relatively worse. Based on this study, we suggest new directions for the conduct of public diplomacy. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Studies Quarterly Vol. 54, No. 3; Sep 2010: p.855-869 |
| Journal Source | International Studies Quarterly Vol. 54, No. 3; Sep 2010: p.855-869 |
| Key Words | Framing ; Public Diplomacy ; Anti-Americanism ; Central Asia ; United States |