| ID | 099570 |
| Title Proper | Democracy's free school |
| Other Title Information | Tocqueville and Lieber on the value of the Jury |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Dzur, Albert W |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This essay discusses the jury's value in American democracy by examining Alexis de Tocqueville's analysis of the jury as a free school for the public. His account of jury socialization, which stressed lay deference to judges and trust in professional knowledge, was one side of a complex set of ideas about trust and authority in American political thought. Tocqueville's contemporary Francis Lieber held juries to have important competencies and to be ambivalent rather than deferential regarding court professionals. The nineteenth-century courtroom exhibited such ambivalence and was marked by institutional conflict involving increasing professional authority demanded by the bench and populist counter-pressures. Assessing the value of the jury today may require some of the conceptual tools Tocqueville offers, but must also renew an appreciation of the jury as a site that utilizes already existing juridical capabilities of lay people and thus re-conceive the relationship between lay people and court professionals. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Theory Vol. 38, No. 5; Oct 2010: p603-630 |
| Journal Source | Political Theory Vol. 38, No. 5; Oct 2010: p603-630 |
| Key Words | Tocqueville ; Lieber ; Jury ; Democracy ; Professionals ; Public School |