| ID | 099789 |
| Title Proper | Dark Matter of terrorism |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Boyd, Dallas ; Scouras, James |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The consequences of states' reactions to terrorist attacks can far outweigh the effects of the attacks themselves. Yet risk analysis, widely accepted as the proper analytical basis for assessing terrorist threats, largely ignores the consequences from potential reactions to attacks. It also generally fails to consider how the anticipation of these reactions may influence terrorists' attack preferences. Policymakers should therefore be wary of the limitations of risk analysis as currently practiced. Further, states should strive to avoid reactions to attacks that unwittingly further their adversaries' agendas, a goal that may be aided by strengthening public resilience to terrorism. |
| `In' analytical Note | Studies in Conflict and Terrorism Vol. 33, No. 12; Dec 2010: p.1124 - 1139 |
| Journal Source | Studies in Conflict and Terrorism Vol. 33, No. 12; Dec 2010: p.1124 - 1139 |
| Key Words | Terrorism ; Terrorist Attacks ; Terrorist Threats |